<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who needs 800 HDTV channels?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shakegently.com/2007/07/03/who-needs-800-hdtv-channels/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shakegently.com/2007/07/03/who-needs-800-hdtv-channels/</link>
	<description>add business, marketing and technology together.  shake gently.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 13:56:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: HDTV Cheap</title>
		<link>http://shakegently.com/2007/07/03/who-needs-800-hdtv-channels/comment-page-1/#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>HDTV Cheap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 19:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shakegently.com.s24970.gridserver.com/?p=112#comment-124</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;HDTV Cheap&lt;/strong&gt;

excellent point</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>HDTV Cheap</strong></p>
<p>excellent point</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dustin Jacobsen</title>
		<link>http://shakegently.com/2007/07/03/who-needs-800-hdtv-channels/comment-page-1/#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustin Jacobsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 03:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shakegently.com.s24970.gridserver.com/?p=112#comment-128</guid>
		<description>Andy, I agree about true on-demand.  The bandwidth is there, but I don&#039;t think the cable or satellite vendors have everything lined up yet.

If I want to watch a movie, I want to watch it now, not wait 45 minutes for it to start over again.

But, in the same manner, I don&#039;t want to wait 45 minutes for the content to download either.

One company that I&#039;ve checked out recently is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.joost.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Joost&lt;/a&gt;.  If Apple combines a service like this with AppleTV, I think they will be on to something.

Also, if AppleTV could insert ads into content that were relevant and personalized to the end user based on their iTunes profile, the advertising opportunities for TV would be back again.  Similar to Tivo in regards to playback, only allowing content to be inserted on playback in real time vs. encoded into the content, more like in-game advertising.

Charging $2.00 to watch an episode from the night before might not be worth it when you could record it with a DVR.  But, there may be more content available in HD that would not otherwise be available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy, I agree about true on-demand.  The bandwidth is there, but I don&#8217;t think the cable or satellite vendors have everything lined up yet.</p>
<p>If I want to watch a movie, I want to watch it now, not wait 45 minutes for it to start over again.</p>
<p>But, in the same manner, I don&#8217;t want to wait 45 minutes for the content to download either.</p>
<p>One company that I&#8217;ve checked out recently is <a href="http://www.joost.com/" rel="nofollow">Joost</a>.  If Apple combines a service like this with AppleTV, I think they will be on to something.</p>
<p>Also, if AppleTV could insert ads into content that were relevant and personalized to the end user based on their iTunes profile, the advertising opportunities for TV would be back again.  Similar to Tivo in regards to playback, only allowing content to be inserted on playback in real time vs. encoded into the content, more like in-game advertising.</p>
<p>Charging $2.00 to watch an episode from the night before might not be worth it when you could record it with a DVR.  But, there may be more content available in HD that would not otherwise be available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HDTV Central &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Who needs 800 HDTV channels?</title>
		<link>http://shakegently.com/2007/07/03/who-needs-800-hdtv-channels/comment-page-1/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>HDTV Central &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Who needs 800 HDTV channels?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 23:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shakegently.com.s24970.gridserver.com/?p=112#comment-127</guid>
		<description>[...] Who needs 800 HDTV channels? Comcast DIRECTV Interesting article over at Ars Technica &#8230; d have me sold. Technorati Tags: TV, HDTV, high definition, HD Add comment July 3rd, 2007 &#8230; Read full article&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Who needs 800 HDTV channels? Comcast DIRECTV Interesting article over at Ars Technica &#8230; d have me sold. Technorati Tags: TV, HDTV, high definition, HD Add comment July 3rd, 2007 &#8230; Read full article&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Huckaba</title>
		<link>http://shakegently.com/2007/07/03/who-needs-800-hdtv-channels/comment-page-1/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Huckaba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 23:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shakegently.com.s24970.gridserver.com/?p=112#comment-129</guid>
		<description>If you remember some of our earlier discussions regarding control going to the user, you&#039;ll realize the direction is away from linear channels and to a more &quot;on-demand&quot; environment. Basically, you&#039;ll be able to watch anything you want, when you want to watch it. In that environment, the programming possibilities are limitless! Take a look at my post on 8/10/2006 called A World Without Channels. http://www.finitytech.com/2006/08/world-without-channels.html .  As we see more user generated content, there will be more unique choices for everyone.  Maybe not &quot;better&quot; choices, but certainly more unique.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you remember some of our earlier discussions regarding control going to the user, you&#8217;ll realize the direction is away from linear channels and to a more &#8220;on-demand&#8221; environment. Basically, you&#8217;ll be able to watch anything you want, when you want to watch it. In that environment, the programming possibilities are limitless! Take a look at my post on 8/10/2006 called A World Without Channels. <a href="http://www.finitytech.com/2006/08/world-without-channels.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.finitytech.com/2006/08/world-without-channels.html</a> .  As we see more user generated content, there will be more unique choices for everyone.  Maybe not &#8220;better&#8221; choices, but certainly more unique.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: University Update - DirecTV - Who needs 800 HDTV channels?</title>
		<link>http://shakegently.com/2007/07/03/who-needs-800-hdtv-channels/comment-page-1/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>University Update - DirecTV - Who needs 800 HDTV channels?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 20:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shakegently.com.s24970.gridserver.com/?p=112#comment-123</guid>
		<description>[...]                       Link to Article                directv Who needs 800 HDTV channels? &#187;  Posted at  Shake Gently - advertising [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]                       Link to Article                directv Who needs 800 HDTV channels? &#187;  Posted at  Shake Gently &#8211; advertising [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://shakegently.com/2007/07/03/who-needs-800-hdtv-channels/comment-page-1/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 19:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shakegently.com.s24970.gridserver.com/?p=112#comment-126</guid>
		<description>There are more than 800 TV stations broadcasting in the United States alone.  So it is safe to assume that some of these 800 would be the local channels for the viewer, some would be the cable channels we all know (CNN, CSPAN, HBO, ...) and some might be the channels that come from major markets outside of the local viewer&#039;s area.  A lot of people would probably like to see local news from their hometown if they live in New York but came from Los Angeles.  Besides there are going to be channels from outside the US possibly offered as well (as the satellite dish people already offer).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are more than 800 TV stations broadcasting in the United States alone.  So it is safe to assume that some of these 800 would be the local channels for the viewer, some would be the cable channels we all know (CNN, CSPAN, HBO, &#8230;) and some might be the channels that come from major markets outside of the local viewer&#8217;s area.  A lot of people would probably like to see local news from their hometown if they live in New York but came from Los Angeles.  Besides there are going to be channels from outside the US possibly offered as well (as the satellite dish people already offer).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: University Update - Comcast - Who needs 800 HDTV channels?</title>
		<link>http://shakegently.com/2007/07/03/who-needs-800-hdtv-channels/comment-page-1/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>University Update - Comcast - Who needs 800 HDTV channels?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 18:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shakegently.com.s24970.gridserver.com/?p=112#comment-125</guid>
		<description>[...]                       Link to Article                comcast Who needs 800 HDTV channels? &#187;  Posted at  Shake Gently - advertising [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]                       Link to Article                comcast Who needs 800 HDTV channels? &#187;  Posted at  Shake Gently &#8211; advertising [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
